Springs Produce Favorable Morphologic Outcomes Relative to H-Craniectomy According to a Two-Center Comparison of Matched Cases

• Published in: Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) Vol. 154; no. 2; p. 317e
• Main Authors: Fischer, Sara, Unander-Scharin, Jesper, Bhatti-Söfteland, Madiha, Nysjö, Johan, Maltese, Giovanni, Lif, Hanna, Tarnow, Peter, Enblad, Per, Kölby, Lars, Nowinski, Daniel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.08.2024
• Subjects: Child, Preschool; Craniosynostoses - surgery; Craniotomy - methods; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Male; Operative Time; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1529-4242
• DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010761

Sagittal synostosis is the most common type of premature suture closure, and many surgical techniques are used to correct scaphocephalic skull shape. Given the rarity of direct comparisons of different surgical techniques for correcting craniosynostosis, this study compared outcomes of craniotomy combined with springs and H-craniectomy for nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis. Comparisons were performed using available preoperative and postoperative imaging and follow-up data from the 2 craniofacial national referral centers in Sweden, which perform 2 different surgical techniques: craniotomy combined with springs and H-craniectomy (the Renier technique). The study included 23 pairs of patients matched for sex, preoperative cephalic index, and age. Cephalic index, total intracranial volume (ICV), and partial ICV were measured before surgery and at 3 years of age, with volume measurements compared against those of preoperative and postoperative controls. Perioperative data included operation time, blood loss, volume of transfused blood, and length of hospital stay. Craniotomy combined with springs resulted in less bleeding and lower transfusion rates than H-craniectomy. Although the spring technique requires 2 operations, the mean total operation time was similar for the methods. Of the 3 complications that occurred in the group treated with springs, 2 were spring-related. The compiled analysis of changes in cephalic index and partial volume distribution revealed that craniotomy combined with springs resulted in superior morphologic correction. The findings showed that craniotomy combined with springs normalized cranial morphology to a greater extent than H-craniectomy based on changes in cephalic index and total and partial ICVs over time. Therapeutic, III.