Self-archiving of biomedical papers in open access repositories

• Published in: Revista de neurologiá Vol. 50; no. 7; pp. 431 - 440
• Main Authors: Abad-García, M Francisca, Melero, Remedios, Abadal, Ernest, González-Teruel, Aurora
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Spanish
• Published: Spain 01.04.2010
• Subjects: Access to Information; Archives; Biomedical Research; Publishing
• ISSN: 1576-6578
• DOI: 10.33588/rn.5007.2009628

Open-access literature is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions. Self-archiving or deposit of scholarly outputs in institutional repositories (open-access green route) is increasingly present in the activities of the scientific community. Besides the benefits of open access for visibility and dissemination of science, it is increasingly more often required by funding agencies to deposit papers and any other type of documents in repositories. In the biomedical environment this is even more relevant by the impact scientific literature can have on public health. However, to make self-archiving feasible, authors should be aware of its meaning and the terms in which they are allowed to archive their works. In that sense, there are some tools like Sherpa/RoMEO or DULCINEA (both directories of copyright licences of scientific journals at different levels) to find out what rights are retained by authors when they publish a paper and if they allow to implement self-archiving. PubMed Central and its British and Canadian counterparts are the main thematic repositories for biomedical fields. In our country there is none of similar nature, but most of the universities and CSIC, have already created their own institutional repositories. The increase in visibility of research results and their impact on a greater and earlier citation is one of the most frequently advance of open access, but removal of economic barriers to access to information is also a benefit to break borders between groups.