Relation between selenium plasma levels and different prostatic pathologies

Several studies have demonstrated an inverse relation between serum selenium levels (Se) and advanced prostate cancer (PCa). To determine and compare selenium plasma levels in patients with different prostatic pathologies. It is a transversal, descriptive and comparative study. A sample of 64 men be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActas urologicas españolas Vol. 34; no. 7; pp. 625 - 629
Main Authors López Fontana, C M, Pérez Elizalde, R F, Vanrell, M C M, Recalde, G M, Uvilla, A L, López Laur, J D
Format Journal Article
LanguageSpanish
Published Spain 01.07.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Several studies have demonstrated an inverse relation between serum selenium levels (Se) and advanced prostate cancer (PCa). To determine and compare selenium plasma levels in patients with different prostatic pathologies. It is a transversal, descriptive and comparative study. A sample of 64 men between 50 and 80 years old were selected for the study between 2007 and 2009. All volunteers underwent a digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen level, ultrasound and transrectal prostate biopsy (12-14 chips). Prostate cancer was subclassified according to Gleason Score. Selenium was determined indirectly by serum Glutathione peroxidase (Kit Ransel, Randox SRL, Crumlin, UK). Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA I (p<0.05). Glutathione Peroxidase level was 33.75+/-2.36 mg/ml in control patients. A decrease of 31.6% was observed in patients with BPH (23.08+/-1.57 mg/ml) and of (63.6%) in subjects with prostate cancer (12.28+/-1.03 mg/ml) (p<0,0001). There was no correlation with the Gleason Score. Serum Seleniun is lower in patients with prostatic pathologies being even more important in cancer patients regardless the Gleason Score.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1699-7980
DOI:10.1016/j.acuro.2010.03.0281