Measurement of vascular access blood flow rate during hemodyalisis in 38 patients using the thermodilution technique. A comparative study with the Delta-H method

• Published in: Nefrología Vol. 28; no. 4; pp. 447 - 452
• Main Authors: Roca-Tey, R, Samon, R, Ibrik, O, Giménez, I, Viladoms, J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Spanish
• Published: Spain 2008
• Subjects: Aged; Catheters, Indwelling; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Regional Blood Flow; Renal Dialysis; Thermodilution - methods
• ISSN: 0211-6995

Periodic QA measurement is the preferred way for VA surveillance in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients (pts). The aims of this study were to measure QA by TDT and to compare the functional results with Delta-H method. We measured Q(A) non invasively in 38 VA (mean VA duration: 48.7 +/- 69.8 months) during HD in 38 stable ESRD (mean age 63.8 +/- 15.1 yr, mean time on HD 47.6 +/- 53.9 months, diabetic nephropathy 18.4%) pts by the TDT. Fourteen pts (36.8%) had history of previous VA that were ipsilateral to the VA under study in most cases (11/14, 78.6%). Thirteen pts (34.2%) had history of any comorbidity (coronary artery or cerebrovascular or peripheral vascular diseases). Q(A) was calculated from the recirculation values obtained by means of the blood temperature monitor (BTM), integrated into the Fresenius Medical Care 4008-S machine, at normal and reverse configurations of the HD blood lines. Q(A) was measured within the first hour of two consecutive HD sessions (the values were averaged). Mean arterial pressure MAP and distance between needles (DBN) were measured simultaneous with Q(A). In addition, the VA blood flow was also determined by Delta-H method using Crit-Line III Monitor (ABF-) between 1000 and 1500 ml/min. The mean DBN and MAP were 6.2 +/- 2.9 cm, 91.9 +/- 12.4 mmHg, respectively. Mean Q(A) was similar for pts with mean MAP<100 mmHg (n=26) and for pts with mean MAP>or=100 mmHg (n=12) (p=0.85). Pts with diabetic nephropathy showed lower mean Q(A) (836.1 +/- 395.8 ml/min) compared to the remaining pts (1,245.9 +/- 449.9 ml/min) (p=0.033). No differences in mean Q(A) was found when pts with any comorbidity and without comorbidities were compared (p=0.62). Brachial AVF tended to have higher mean Q(A) (1,323.6 +/- 465.3 ml/min) compared to radial AVF (1,017.4 +/- 447.3 ml/min) (p=0.052). Pts with history of previous VA showed higher mean Q(A) (1,410.6 +/- 377.7 ml/min) compared to the remaining pts (1,030.4 +/- 458.7 ml/min) (p=0.013). No correlation was found between mean Q(A) and: mean age, DBN, MAP, Kt/V index, time on HD and VA duration. Mean Q(A) obtained by TDT was not different when compared with mean ABF determined by Delta-H method (1,151.3 +/- 479.0 ml/min) (p=0.89). The calculated values of VA blood flow obtained by TDT were highly correlated with those determined by the Delta-H method (intraclass correlation coefficient =0.95, p<0.001). The TDT is an indicator of QA during HD. The functional profile of VA was worse in pts with diabetic nephropathy or without history of previous VA. The VA blood flow values obtained by TDT and Delta-H techniques correlated highly with each other.