Cost-effectiveness and degree of satisfaction with home sleep monitoring in patients with symptoms of sleep apnea

• Published in: Archivos de bronconeumología Vol. 43; no. 11; pp. 605 - 610
• Main Authors: Jurado Gámez, Bernabé, Redel Montero, Javier, Muñoz Cabrera, Luis, Fernández Marín, Mari Carmen, Muñoz Gomáriz, Elisa, Martín Pérez, Miguel Angel, Cosano Povedano, Andrés
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Spanish
• Published: Spain 01.11.2007
• Subjects: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Home Care Services - economics; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Polysomnography - economics; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive - diagnosis; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive - economics; Spain; Spain
• ISSN: 0300-2896
• DOI: 10.1157/13111346

To assess the diagnostic validity, degree of patient satisfaction, and economic cost of home sleep monitoring compared to conventional polysomnography. Consecutive patients with symptoms indicative of sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) were included. We analyzed the diagnostic yield of home sleep monitoring using the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), number of desaturations of at least 3%, and the percentage time with arterial oxygen saturation below 90%. The degree of patient satisfaction, measured on a visual analogue scale, and the cost of home monitoring were compared with conventional polysomnography. The study included 52 patients (42 men and 10 women) with a mean (SD) age of 51.8 (9) years and a body mass index of 32 (5) kg/m2. Polysomnography and home monitoring revealed an AHI of 33.6 (20) and 31 (19), respectively (r=0.971; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.963; P< .001). The number of desaturations of at least 3% and the percentage time with arterial oxygen saturation below 90% showed significant correlation and concordance (P< .05). For an AHI cutoff of 10 recorded with polysomnography, home monitoring had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 80%, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.804. For severe SAHS (AHI> or =30), the sensitivity and specificity of home monitoring was 100% (that is, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 1). For home monitoring, the cost per diagnostic test was 101.34 euro less than that of polysomnography, and the patient satisfaction was significantly greater (P< .0001). Home sleep monitoring is a valid and cost-effective diagnostic test; patients with symptoms of SAHS are more satisfied with this technique than conventional polysomnography.