Preclinical toxicology of bisphosphonates

• Published in: Medicina (Buenos Aires) Vol. 57 Suppl 1; p. 93
• Main Authors: Mondelo, N, Peluffo, V A, Parma, M D, Cointry, G R, Capozza, R F, Ferretti, J L, Piccinni, E, Montuori, E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Spanish
• Published: Argentina 1997
• Subjects: Animals; Bone and Bones - drug effects; Bone Density - drug effects; Bone Remodeling - drug effects; Digestive System - drug effects; Diphosphonates - administration & dosage; Diphosphonates - pharmacology; Diphosphonates - toxicity; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Humans; Hypocalcemia - chemically induced; Mice; Rabbits; Rats
• ISSN: 0025-7680

Bisphosphonates regulate bone turnover by inhibiting osteoclastic bone resorption. Due to their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics, bisphosphonates have a special pharmacotoxicological profile related to their high degree of specificity: low or non-existent distribution in soft tissues and strong affinity for calcified tissues. Some general conclusions may be drawn from the pre-clinical toxicological studies, whose main aim is to identify the toxicity target organ/s and estimate the safety margins of a "prospective therapeutic agent" in laboratory animals. They are based on our own results and on data from the available literature as regards various bisphosphonates: Alendronate, Clodronate, Etidronate, Olpadronate and Pamidronate. Generally, very high doses of bisphosphonates are required to produce in different levels and incidence various extra-skeletical toxic side effects: local reaction, hypocalcemia (and its consequences on the cardiovascular system and the possibility of tetany), affection of the dental structures and renal dysfunction. Most of side effects may be related to the low solubility in biological fluids, the formation of calcium complexes, the potent inhibitory effect of endogenous or induced bone resorption as well as to its main excretion pathway. Some other side effects (on the eye, lungs and liver), may be related to repeated excessive high doses. A safety margin of 200 to 300 : 1 between the "toxic" and "pharmacological" doses may be estimated if the total quantity of Olpadronate given to various animal species in toxicological studies and in pharmacodynamic experimental models (osteopenias due to estrogen deprivation or immobilization and retinoid-induced hypercalcemia) is considered. If the toxic doses in animals are related to the highest doses suggested for human beings, then the ratio increases from 300 to 1000 : 1 depending on the pathology and the route of administration. As regards their effect on the bone, experimental data with the new bisphosphonates suggest a significant dissociation between pharmacologically active doses and those ones producing defective mineralization. The excessive inhibition of bone remodelling, due to the use of high doses in normal animals, is the natural consequence of the pharmacological effect of this family of compounds. A bisphosphonate's toxic potential effect on bone should not be evaluated in normal animals but in particular situations with a high bone turnover. Furthermore, the doses should be adjusted in order to regulate the magnitude of bone remodelling inhibition so as to take it to a normal level without totally suppressing it. Potency, safety margins, doses and proper administration schemes, should be considered as key elements for the optimum use of the therapeutic potentiality of these compounds.