(18)F-FDG uptake by rectal cancer is similar in mucinous and nonmucinous histological subtypes

PET/CT has been considered limited for the evaluation of mucinous colorectal tumors due to low (18)F-FDG uptake. The aim of our study was to compare PET/CT variables in mucinous (MC) and nonmucinous (NMC) rectal adenocarcinomas. Consecutive patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 rectal cancer included in a prosp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of nuclear medicine Vol. 30; no. 8; pp. 513 - 517
Main Authors Dos Anjos, Dalton A, Habr-Gama, Angelita, Vailati, Bruna B, Rossi, Cecilia B, Coturel, Adelina E, Perez, Rodrigo O, São Julião, Guilherme P, de Sousa, João B, Buchpiguel, Carlos A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan 01.10.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:PET/CT has been considered limited for the evaluation of mucinous colorectal tumors due to low (18)F-FDG uptake. The aim of our study was to compare PET/CT variables in mucinous (MC) and nonmucinous (NMC) rectal adenocarcinomas. Consecutive patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 rectal cancer included in a prospective clinical trial were reviewed. PET/CT was performed for primary baseline staging. Visual and quantitative analysis included SUVmax and SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). PET/CT parameters were compared according to histological subtypes. Overall, 73 patients were included (18 mucinous and 55 nonmucinous). SUVmax values were similar between MC and NMC (19.7 vs. 16.6; p = 0.5). MTV and TLG values were greater in the MC group (103.9 vs. 54.1; p = 0.007 and 892.5 vs. 358.8; p = 0.020) due to larger tumor volumes of MC. Metabolic parameters at baseline PET/CT for patients with rectal cancer are similar in mucinous and nonmucinous histological subtypes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1864-6433
DOI:10.1007/s12149-016-1089-4