Evaluation of myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary slow flow by myocardial contrast echocardiography

To explore myocardial perfusion of patients with coronary slow flow (CSF) using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed in coronary artery angiography diagnosed CSF patients (n = 20) and control patients (n = 20). The images at baseline and after low...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inZhōnghuá xīnxuèguănbìng zázhì Vol. 41; no. 4; p. 293
Main Authors Wang, Sheng-Huang, Zhu, Na, Zhou, Hong-Lin, Chen, Li-Bin, Cui, Han-Bin
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published China 01.04.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To explore myocardial perfusion of patients with coronary slow flow (CSF) using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed in coronary artery angiography diagnosed CSF patients (n = 20) and control patients (n = 20). The images at baseline and after low dose dobutamine stress test were analyzed by automatic tracking software and the maximal amplitude score A, the mean ascending slope of the curve β and the product of A×β were measured. The reserve of A×β was also calculated. Electrocardiogram at rest and at each stage of dobutamine stress test was obtained simultaneously. At baseline, the A [(6.85 ± 2.99) dB vs. (7.01 ± 3.49) dB], β[(0.59 ± 0.33)/s vs. (0.61 ± 0.38)/s] and A×β [(3.48 ± 1.46) dB/s vs. (3.31 ± 0.96) dB/s] values were similar between CSF group and control group (all P > 0.05). After dobutamine stress test, both β and A×β were significantly increased in two groups. The β [(0.89 ± 0.42)/s vs. (1.31 ± 0.54)/s, P < 0.01] and A×β [(5.82 ± 2.69) dB/s vs. (
ISSN:0253-3758
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2013.04.007