Targeted immunotherapy efficacy analysis in patients with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphocytic leukemia

Comparison of conventional chemotherapy and immunotargeted therapy efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute B cell leukemia (B-ALL) . The clinical data of 212 patients with R/R B-ALL in the Affiliaed Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2008 to July 2020 were analyze...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inZhōnghuá xuèyèxué zázhì Vol. 43; no. 11; p. 946
Main Authors Su, Y, Bao, S, Wei, Y P, Song, L J, Xue, Y M, Wei, X D, Song, Y P, Yin, Q S
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published China 14.11.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Comparison of conventional chemotherapy and immunotargeted therapy efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute B cell leukemia (B-ALL) . The clinical data of 212 patients with R/R B-ALL in the Affiliaed Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2008 to July 2020 were analyzed retrospectively to compare the response rate and survival time difference between conventional chemotherapy and immunotargeted therapies (antiCD19 CAR-T and CD3CD19 bi-specific antibody blinatumomab) , and to explore the related factors affecting prognosis. The CR rate of patients with R/R B-ALL treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T cells was 80.4% , patients treated with blinatumomab was 62.5% , and patients treated with chemotherapy was 38.6% . There was significant difference in the CR rate among the three therapies ( <0.001) . CAR-T cells 1-year OS rate was 41.5% , which was significantly higher than that of the chemotherapy group (10.3% ) ( <0.001) . The 1-year PFS rate of CAR-T cells (30.1% ) was also significantly
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0253-2727
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2022.11.011