Biocompatibility of a restorative resin-modified glass ionomer cement applied in very deep cavities prepared in human teeth

This study evaluated whether a restorative resin-modified glass ionomer cement, Vitremer (VM), would be biocompatible with pulp tissue when used as a liner in very deep cavities prepared in young human permanent teeth. Two dental cements in current use as liner materials, Vitrebond (VB) and Dycal (D...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeneral dentistry Vol. 64; no. 4; p. 33
Main Authors Soares, Diana Gabriela, Basso, Fernanda Gonçalves, Scheffel, Débora Lopes Sales, Giro, Elisa Maria Aparecida, de Souza Costa, Carlos Alberto, Hebling, Josimeri
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.2016
Subjects
Adolescent
Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use
Dental Caries - surgery
Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods
Glass Ionomer Cements - therapeutic use
Humans
Resin Cements - therapeutic use
glass ionomer cements
pulp tissue
biocompatibility
dental materials
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study evaluated whether a restorative resin-modified glass ionomer cement, Vitremer (VM), would be biocompatible with pulp tissue when used as a liner in very deep cavities prepared in young human permanent teeth. Two dental cements in current use as liner materials, Vitrebond (VB) and Dycal (DY), were compared to VM. Class V cavities were prepared in 36 sound premolars that were scheduled for extraction, and the cavity floor was lined with the restorative cement (VM) or a liner/base control cement (VB or DY). For VM specimens, the cavity floor was pretreated with a primer (polyacrylic acid plus 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). Teeth were extracted after 7 or 30 days and processed for microscopic evaluation. In the VM group, inward diffusion of dental material components through dentinal tubules, associated with disruption of the odontoblastic layer, moderate to intense inflammatory response, and resorption of inner dentin, was observed in 2 teeth at 7 days. These histologic features were observed in 1 tooth at 30 days. In the VB group, mild inflammatory reactions and tissue disorganization observed at 7 days were resolved at 30 days. No pulpal damage occurred in the DY specimens. Of the materials tested, only Vitremer was not considered biocompatible, because it caused persistent pulpal damage when applied in very deep cavities (remaining dentin thickness less than 0.3 mm).
ISSN:0363-6771