Literary and Documentary Evidence for Lay Medical Practice in the Roman Republic and Empire

The majority of surviving ancient medical literature was written by medical practitioners and produced for the purpose of ensuring the effective diagnosis and treatment of their patients, suggesting an audience of medical professionals ranging from instructors to students. This has led historians to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStudies in ancient medicine Vol. 45; p. 432
Main Author Draycott, Jane
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands 2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The majority of surviving ancient medical literature was written by medical practitioners and produced for the purpose of ensuring the effective diagnosis and treatment of their patients, suggesting an audience of medical professionals ranging from instructors to students. This has led historians to concentrate on the professional medical practitioner and their theories, methods and practices, rather than on lay medical practitioners, or even patients themselves. This chapter seeks to redress this imbalance, and examine the ancient literary and documentary evidence for lay medical theories, methods and practices in the Roman Republic and Empire in an attempt to reconstruct the experiences of lay medical practitioners and their patients. The Roman agricultural treatises of Cato, Varro and Columella, papyri and ostraca from Egypt, and tablets from Britain are investigated, and it is established that the individual's personal acquisition of knowledge and expertise, not only from medical professionals and works of medical literature, but also from family members and friends, and through trial and error, was considered fundamental to domestic medical practice.
ISSN:0925-1421
DOI:10.1163/9789004305564_019