Prognostic value of assessment tools on elderly patients with chronic advanced disease and end of life, admitted to an intermediate care centre

To apply 3advanced chronic disease evaluation tools in elderly patients admitted to an intermediate and long-term care centre, and evaluate its relationship with mortality. The NECPAL tool, PROFUND prognostic index, and Charlson comorbidity index were applied to 87 patients. The NECPAL tool identifi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista española de geriatría y gerontología Vol. 53; no. 2; pp. 77 - 80
Main Authors da Costa, Elizabeth, Robles, María José, Sánchez-Rodríguez, María Dolores, Vázquez-Ibar, Olga, Miralles, Ramón
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Spanish
Published Spain 01.03.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To apply 3advanced chronic disease evaluation tools in elderly patients admitted to an intermediate and long-term care centre, and evaluate its relationship with mortality. The NECPAL tool, PROFUND prognostic index, and Charlson comorbidity index were applied to 87 patients. The NECPAL tool identified 31 patients (35.6%) in need of palliative care, and according to the PROFUND index, 45 (54.7%) had high/very high risk of mortality (≥7 points), and according to Charlson index, 31 (35.6%) had high comorbidity (≥4 points). Of the NECPAL positive patients, 80.5% had a PROFUND index score ≥7, and 48.3% a Charlson index ≥ 4. These percentages were 34.4% and 28.5% in negative NECPAL patients (P<.001 and P≤.06, respectively). Correlations between the 3tools: quantitative (Spearman) number of responses in NECPAL with PROFUND (r=.57; P<.001); with Charlson (r=.214; P<.047) and between PROFUND and Charlson (r=.157; P=.148). Qualitative (kappa) NECPAL (positive/negative) with PROFUND (cut-off 6/7) (0.40; P<.001), and Charlson (cut-off 3/4) (0.19; P=.080) and between PROFUND and Charlson (0.08; P=.399). Mortality prediction (area under the curve): NECPAL 3 months 0.81 (95% CI: 0.62-1.00); 6 months 0.71 (95% CI: 0.53-0.89) and 12 months 0.67 (95% CI: 0.52-0.82). PROFUND 3 months 0.71 (95% CI: 0.50-0.91); 6 months 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.87), and 12 months 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57-0.81). Charlson 3 months 0.72 (95% CI: 0.52-0.91); 6 months 0.62 (95% CI: 0.45-0.80), and 12 months 0.64 (95% CI: 0.50-0.78). The 3tools were significantly associated with high mortality. A low concordance was found between the results of the different tools.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1578-1747
DOI:10.1016/j.regg.2017.06.011