Life After Research Misconduct

• Published in: Journal of empirical research on human research ethics Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 26
• Main Author: Galbraith, Kyle L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.02.2017
• Subjects: Biomedical Research - ethics; Censorship, Research; Databases, Factual; Ethics, Research; Humans; Publishing - ethics; Research Personnel - ethics; Research Support as Topic - ethics; Scientific Misconduct; United States; United States Office of Research Integrity; responsible conduct of research; research misconduct; administrative actions; post-misconduct careers; research integrity
• ISSN: 1556-2654; 1556-2654
• DOI: 10.1177/1556264616682568

Research misconduct is a serious violation of a scientific community's ethical standards. Scientists who commit research misconduct typically face corrective actions from employers and funding agencies, as well as significant professional stigma. Unfortunately, there is little systematic data about the post-misconduct career of these guilty parties. Through a review of Office of Research Integrity (ORI) case summaries, I identified a pool of 284 researchers who engaged in research misconduct and were subject to ORI corrective actions. To assess the prevalence of post-misconduct research activities for these scientists, I searched publicly available databases and online resources for evidence of post-misconduct research activities (such as publications and federal research support). The data demonstrate that researchers often receive second chances as researchers, with indicators of post-misconduct research activities identified for 134 (47.18%) of the offending researchers. In addition, those researchers have received more than US$123 million in federal support for their post-misconduct research efforts.