Humeral component modularity may not be an important factor in the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis
We examined the outcomes of using 3 types of humeral prostheses in total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a modular prosthesis with variable head diameters (MV), a nonmodular prosthesis with variable head diameters (NV), and a nonmodular prosthesis with a fixed head diameter (NF). Patients...
Saved in:
Published in | The American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.) Vol. 34; no. 4; p. 173 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.04.2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We examined the outcomes of using 3 types of humeral prostheses in total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a modular prosthesis with variable head diameters (MV), a nonmodular prosthesis with variable head diameters (NV), and a nonmodular prosthesis with a fixed head diameter (NF). Patients (N=101) completed self-assessments of shoulder function and health status before surgery and at follow-up between 30 and 60 months after surgery. Outcomes for the MV and NV prostheses did not differ statistically. The NF prosthesis trended toward poorer functional scores. Two Short Form-36 dimensions were statistically significantly lower (P<.05) in the NF group than in the MV and NV groups. These results fail to confirm that humeral component modularity is an important factor in the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-4519 |