A comparison of cardiac (31)P MRS at 1.5 and 3 T

(31)P MRS was evaluated on normal volunteers at 1.5 and 3 T, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the two field strengths was calculated. The in vivo spin-lattice, T(1), relaxation times for PCr and gamma-ATP, which are essential for correcting for the effects of radiofrequency saturation on the P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNMR in biomedicine Vol. 21; no. 8; p. 793
Main Authors Tyler, Damian J, Hudsmith, Lucy E, Clarke, Kieran, Neubauer, Stefan, Robson, Matthew D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.10.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:(31)P MRS was evaluated on normal volunteers at 1.5 and 3 T, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the two field strengths was calculated. The in vivo spin-lattice, T(1), relaxation times for PCr and gamma-ATP, which are essential for correcting for the effects of radiofrequency saturation on the PCr/ATP ratio, were determined at 3 T. The T(1) values for six volunteers were 3.8 +/- 0.7 s for PCr (mean +/- SD) and 2.4 +/- 1.1 s for gamma-ATP, which are similar to reported values at 1.5 T, allowing us to use protocols developed at 1.5 T at the new clinical field strength of 3 T. Direct comparison between 1.5 T and 3 T in the same 10 subjects, using coils of identical geometry and identical pulse sequences gave a mean SNR for PCr at 3 T which was 206 +/- 94% of that at 1.5 T. The linewidth for PCr increased from 13 +/- 6 Hz at 1.5 T to 22 +/- 12 Hz at 3 T. The coefficient of variation in the measurement of PCr/ATP, based on the Cramer-Rao lower bounds, was reduced from 32 +/- 25% at 1.5 T to 18 +/- 13% at 3 T. Thus, (31)P MRS at 3 T is greatly improved by the increase in SNR compared with acquisitions at 1.5 T because of the higher field strength.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0952-3480
DOI:10.1002/nbm.1255