AngioJet experience from the multi-center STENT Registry

To explore the utilization and clinical outcomes of AngioJet Rheolytic thrombectomy from the Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies (STENT) multi-center prospective registry from May 2003 through December 2005. Prospective consent was sought for all consecutive percutaneous coronary int...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of invasive cardiology Vol. 18 Suppl C; pp. C22 - C23
Main Authors Simonton, 3rd, Charles A, Brodie, Bruce R, Wilson, Hadley, Haber, Robert, Kowalchuk, Glen, Rinaldi, Michael, Cedarholm, John, Humphrey, Angela, Laurent, Sherry
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To explore the utilization and clinical outcomes of AngioJet Rheolytic thrombectomy from the Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies (STENT) multi-center prospective registry from May 2003 through December 2005. Prospective consent was sought for all consecutive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients at all institutions and achieved in 84% of all patients. Of these, clinical follow-up at 9 months was achieved in 94% of eligible patients at all institutions. Of a total of 9,707 patients, AngioJet was utilized in 3-4% of all procedures, including 12-14% of all procedures with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 3 thrombus or greater and 10-12% of acute evolving MI patients. Nine-month clinical outcomes showed similar mortality rates for patients treated with AngioJet (5.0%) versus those with no thrombectomy (6.5%) for patients with thrombus grade 3 or greater, despite the higher clinical risk profile of the AngioJet patient population due to a higher percentage of cardiogenic shock and larger thrombus. The results of this larger, multi-center registry indicate that AngioJet thrombectomy, when selected in general clinical practice for high risk patients with thrombus, results in non-significant numerically lower rate of mortality with no indication of safety issues.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1557-2501