The law and ethics of the use of experimental medication in patients incapable of expressing consent: between a rock and a hard place

In Australia, human research ethics committees approve clinical trials of drugs in accordance with federal regulations. Federal guidelines allow for the possible conduct of clinical trials in all populations. Within the State of New South Wales, persons unable to consent because of disability are su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedicine and law Vol. 19; no. 2; p. 189
Main Author Cooper, J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 2000
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In Australia, human research ethics committees approve clinical trials of drugs in accordance with federal regulations. Federal guidelines allow for the possible conduct of clinical trials in all populations. Within the State of New South Wales, persons unable to consent because of disability are subject to State legislation which, until 1998, regarded drug trials as Special Medical Treatment requiring consent of the Guardianship Tribunal. That consent could only be given if an anticipated individual benefit could be proved. As no such guarantee could be given prior to conduct of a clinical trial, it being unethical to trial an active substance against a placebo if potential individual benefit is already proven for the active substance, a conundrum resulted whereby the Tribunal could not give the required approval. Many argued that the New South Wales law resulted in some experimental medications, such as those being available to minimise tissue damage following stroke, or those being specifically developed for those with late stage dementia, not being made available to their target populations. Amendments were made to remove reference to clinical drug trials as Special Medical Treatment, and a new system established whereby such trials could proceed, including the use of a placebo, with the approval of an ethics committee and the Tribunal.
ISSN:0723-1393