Analysis of freshwater pathogens: a guide to rational empiric antibiotic coverage

Fresh water injuries are often contaminated with bacteria that are not typically encountered in other wounds. Their treatment should include empiric administration of appropriate antibiotics. This study identifies the most common pathogens found in the Lake of the Ozarks and their antibiotic sensiti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMissouri medicine Vol. 101; no. 3; p. 219
Main Authors Beckert, Benjamin W, Puckett, Charles L, Concannon, Matthew J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.05.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Fresh water injuries are often contaminated with bacteria that are not typically encountered in other wounds. Their treatment should include empiric administration of appropriate antibiotics. This study identifies the most common pathogens found in the Lake of the Ozarks and their antibiotic sensitivity. Eleven of the twelve lake water samples (92%) had a positive culture result. Sixty-seven percent of lake water samples contained at least two strains of bacteria. Five different bacterial species of gram negative rods were isolated. All isolates were sensitive to Cefotetan, Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone, Imipenem, Levofloxacin, Tobramycin, and Trimetheprim/sulfa. Antibiotic coverage after traumatic wounds required gram positive coverage. Our study suggests the addition of gram negative coverage for penetrating trauma contaminated by fresh water.
ISSN:0026-6620