Managed care matures. What's behind the wave of anti-HMO legislation?

At first glance, it may appear as if managed care itself may be doomed. The avalanche of bills, measures, initiatives, Federal regulations, etc., seemed overwhelming in late 1996. Did this, in fact, portend a national shift away from managed care? What does the consumer protection and regulatory act...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysician executive Vol. 23; no. 5; pp. 32 - 34
Main Author van Amerongen, D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.05.1997
Subjects
Health administration
Health Care Reform - legislation & jurisprudence
Health Expenditures - trends
Health Services Accessibility - trends
Kentucky
Managed Care Programs - legislation & jurisprudence
Managed Care Programs - trends
Medically Uninsured
Patient Advocacy - legislation & jurisprudence
Patient Satisfaction
United States
United States
Kentucky
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:At first glance, it may appear as if managed care itself may be doomed. The avalanche of bills, measures, initiatives, Federal regulations, etc., seemed overwhelming in late 1996. Did this, in fact, portend a national shift away from managed care? What does the consumer protection and regulatory activity really mean? What directions for the future can be identified? This article seeks to answer those questions and highlights a case study of "reform gone awry" that may hold lessons for the national scene. The anti-HMO legislation activity does not represent a repudiation of managed care. Rather, it may be seen as a maturing of the entire process of redefining our medical delivery and financing system.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0898-2759