B7.1 immunogene therapy effectively activates CD(4+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the central nervous system in comparison with B7.2 gene therapy

The B7 gene utilizing immunogene therapy is one of the most common methods against tumor growth. However, there is no known study that investigated the difference between B7.1 and B7.2 with regard to B7 gene therapy in the central nervous system (CNS). Therefore, to clarify the difference, we establ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of oncology Vol. 20; no. 4; p. 807
Main Authors Ando, Hiromichi, Saio, Masanao, Ohe, Naoyuki, Tamakawa, Noriyuki, Yu, Hai, Nakayama, Takashi, Yoshimura, Shin-ichi, Kaku, Yasuhiko, Iwama, Toru, Shinoda, Jun, Sakai, Noboru, Takami, Tsuyoshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Greece 01.04.2002
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The B7 gene utilizing immunogene therapy is one of the most common methods against tumor growth. However, there is no known study that investigated the difference between B7.1 and B7.2 with regard to B7 gene therapy in the central nervous system (CNS). Therefore, to clarify the difference, we established B7.1 or B7.2 gene transduced tumor cells originating from the murine T cell lymphoma cell line EL4 (EL4-B7.1 or EL4-B7.2). First, we observed the survival time after intracranial inoculation of parent (IC-wt) or genetically modified tumor cells. All mice in control groups (IC-wt or IC-mock) were dead within 16 days. While there was significant survival elongation in the B7.2 modified group (IC-B7.2, p=0.0002), all mice in this group were dead of tumor growth within 22 days. On the other hand, 60% of mice inoculated with EL4-B7.1 (IC-B7.1) survived more than 120 days (p<0.0001). Second, to shed light on the anti-tumor immune response in situ, we tried to analyze CD(4+) tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (CD(4+) TIL). To purify and analyze CD(4+) TIL, we had to deplete F4/80(+) microglia because of the CD4 expression. In terms of activation marker expression in CD(4+) TIL, a small population was activated (CD25, 9.8%; CD69, 15.8%) in the control group (IC-wt). In contrast, the activation marker positive CD4+ TIL percentage both in IC-B7.1 (CD25, 25.1%; CD69, 40.1%) and IC-B7.2 (CD25, 16.2%; CD69, 28.3%) appeared to reflect the survival curve in both groups. These findings strongly suggest that, in the CNS, B7.1 gene therapy could effectively introduce CD(4+) TIL activation compared with B7.2 gene therapy. This is the first study clearly describing the difference between B7.1 gene therapy and B7.2 gene therapy in the CNS in terms of the activation status of CD(4+) TIL in situ.
ISSN:1019-6439
DOI:10.3892/ijo.20.4.807