Evaluation of surviving fraction using non-clonogenic staining densitometry method

• Published in: Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica Vol. 54; no. 1; p. 67
• Main Authors: Nishiguchi, I, Ogawa, K, Ito, H, Hashimoto, S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Japanese
• Published: Japan 25.01.1994
• Subjects: Cell Survival - radiation effects; Colony-Forming Units Assay - methods; Densitometry - methods; Humans; Radiation Dosage; Tumor Cells, Cultured - radiation effects
• ISSN: 0048-0428

This study was performed to compare our nonclonogenic survival assay (densitometry assay, DM assay) with the widely used clonogenic assay. The established cell lines (HeLa, RMUG, IMR, GOTO) were grown in F 10 medium. The cells were spread in 24-well plates, irradiated with different doses, cultured for about one week and stained with crystal violet after the culture period. Taking the transparent images of the stained well on the light source with the CCD camera, the images were collected with the matrix size 64 x 64, and the integrated optical density of the entire surface of each well was determined by computer with our original program. As the number of cells in the well is reflected by its staining density, the surviving fraction was calculated as the fraction of growth in the irradiated wells relative to controls. The survival curves obtained by the densitometry method showed good correlations with those obtained by clonogenic assay. It is possible to predict intrinsic radiosensitivity with this assay, even if the cells do not form good colonies. However, this method is based on measurements in cultures which depend on the metabolism and growth kinetics of the irradiated cells. Cells should grow exponentially in the same manner in any well to obtain a result similar to that of clonogenic assay, although growth kinetics may be altered by irradiation. Thus, the endpoint must be strictly standardized.