Rush sublingual immunotherapy in Parietaria allergic patients

• Published in: Allergologia et immunopathologia Vol. 24; no. 4; p. 146
• Main Authors: D'Ambrosio, F P, Ricciardi, L, Isola, S, Savi, E, Parmiani, S, Puccinelli, P, Musarra, A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Spain 01.07.1996
• Subjects: Administration, Sublingual; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Allergens - administration & dosage; Allergens - immunology; Allergens - therapeutic use; Asthma - etiology; Asthma - prevention & control; Asthma - therapy; Conjunctivitis, Allergic - etiology; Conjunctivitis, Allergic - therapy; Desensitization, Immunologic - methods; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Middle Aged; Plant Extracts - administration & dosage; Plant Extracts - immunology; Plant Extracts - therapeutic use; Pollen - immunology; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal - etiology; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal - therapy; Seasons; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0301-0546

Forty patients, monosensitized to Parietaria judaica with a clinical history of at least two years of rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma, were selected and randomly allocated in two groups. According to an open controlled experimental plan, twenty patients were submitted to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with a solution of purified and biologically standardized extract of Parietaria judaica, following a preseasonal rush schedule. All patients, twenty belonging to the SLIT group and twenty belonging to the control group, were allowed to take authorized rescue drugs at need. At the end of the Parietaria pollen season. 15 patients for each group resulted to have complied with the criteria of the study. SLIT tolerance turned out to be excellent as no side effects were noticed in the group under treatment. No change could be detected in specific IgE and IgG4 in either group. According to the daily symptom and drug scores registered by each patient in a diary card, the SLIT group showed a statistically significant lower symptom score (p = 0.032) and lower drug plus symptom score (p = 0.037) during the peak pollen period (May-June 1994) in comparison to the group treated only with symptomatic drugs. Moreover, 13 out of 15 patients submitted to SLIT expressed a very favourable subjective opinion about the therapy and asked to continue the same treatment the following season. According to our results, the rush SLIT schedule, followed by maintenance during the pollen season, is simple, safe and effective for Parietaria pollen allergy and showed an excellent compliance.