An exploration of the variables involved when instituting a do-not-resuscitate order for patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation

Written do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders can facilitate the transition from aggressive care to supportive care in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation who are critically ill. The DNR decision often is complicated by clinical and ethical problems. To assist nurses in analyzing these complex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOncology nursing forum Vol. 19; no. 4; p. 635
Main Authors Kern, D, Kettner, P, Albrizio, M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.05.1992
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Written do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders can facilitate the transition from aggressive care to supportive care in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation who are critically ill. The DNR decision often is complicated by clinical and ethical problems. To assist nurses in analyzing these complex situations, a retrospective review was conducted on medical records of 40 patients who died on an eight-bed bone marrow transplant unit in which a formal DNR policy was in place. A review of specific variables for patients designated DNR and non-DNR showed that the groups did not vary in age, diagnosis, disease, or type of transplant. The non-DNR group developed life-threatening complications earlier in their transplant course, whereas multisystem failure was the common factor among the patients with DNR designation. The few ethical problems documented in the medical records did not appear to reflect the complexity of the DNR decision.
ISSN:0190-535X
1538-0688