A case of pure alexia whose writing ability with eyes closed was superior to that with eyes open

We compared the writing ability between eyes open (looking at one's writing) and eyes closed (without looking) in a case of pure alexia. The patient is a 84-year-old right handed man who developed pure alexia following an infarction in the distribution of the left posterior cerebral artery. He...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNo To Shinkei Vol. 47; no. 9; p. 905
Main Authors Otsuki, M, Soma, Y, Tsuji, S, Aizawa, F, Yamazaki, M, Onishi, Y
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japan 01.09.1995
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We compared the writing ability between eyes open (looking at one's writing) and eyes closed (without looking) in a case of pure alexia. The patient is a 84-year-old right handed man who developed pure alexia following an infarction in the distribution of the left posterior cerebral artery. He showed right homonymous hemianopsia, slight memory disorder and slight anomia. He could not read any kinds of letters and words at all though he could categorize letters: Kana (phonograms), Kanji (morphograms) and Arabic numbers, and he could distinguish the real letters from false ones. He could achieve almost 60-70% of Kana and Kanji dictation, though it was not perfect. He was often confused and could not continue writing correct letters once interrupted. He wrote poorly when looking at what he was writing. So we compared the ability of dictation with his eyes closed, and that with his eyes open. We found the former way never caused confusion and got better results, which was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05)). It seemed that his visual feedback of his own writing rather caused trouble in his writing. Thus we concluded that input (reading) process and output (writing) process work simultaneously and bi-directionally. Slight impairment of writing in pure alexia patients might be caused by the effect of impairment of input (reading) process, which is simultaneously connected with the output (writing) process.
ISSN:0006-8969