Orthopedic residents' perceptions of the content and adequacy of their residency training

• Published in: The American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.) Vol. 27; no. 8; p. 563
• Main Authors: Dailey, S W, Brinker, M R, Elliott, M N
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.08.1998
• Subjects: Adult; Attitude of Health Personnel; Canada; Clinical Competence - standards; Fellowships and Scholarships - statistics & numerical data; Female; Humans; Internship and Residency - standards; Male; Medical Staff, Hospital - education; Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology; Orthopedics - education; Puerto Rico; Surveys and Questionnaires; United States; Canada; United States; Puerto Rico
• ISSN: 1078-4519

The content and adequacy of orthopedic surgery residency training can be evaluated by several means. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Residency Review Committee set standards with which residency programs must comply in order to be accredited. Residents' perceptions of the content and adequacy of their training is another means of evaluating orthopedic residency training. A questionnaire was sent to all graduating orthopedic residents in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. The questionnaire provided program and individual resident demographics, as well as the residents' rating of specific areas of residency training on a 5-point scale (1=superior, 2=above average, 3=average, 4=below average, 5=inadequate). Completed surveys were received from 454 of the 698 graduating orthopedic surgery residents listed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; the response rate was therefore 65.0%. Our respondents were representative of the entire population in terms of geographic and sex distribution. Respondents rated their general orthopedic training at 1.9. The areas of training that had the best ratings included trauma/fracture (1.8), adult reconstruction (1.9), and pediatrics (1.9). The worst rating was reported for training in foot and ankle (2.7). Factors related to better ratings for general orthopedic training included male sex of residents, programs with more full-time faculty, programs with more hours of weekly teaching conferences, programs with one or more faculty present at all teaching conferences and programs in which residents first operate independently at or before postgraduate year 4. Sixty-six percent of all respondents were planning to hold a fellowship immediately after graduation. The most common fellowships taken included sports medicine (20.5% of all respondents), hand (12.1%), and spine (9.5%). Younger graduating residents, those from larger programs (more residents per year), and those from the Mideast (U.S.), and New England regions were most likely to enter a fellowship after graduation.