"I KNOW HIM!": DOES WITNESS-DEFENDANT FAMILIARITY IMPACT MOCK JURORS ACROSS DIFFERENT AGED WITNESSES AND TYPES OF CRIME?

The current study examined whether eyewitness age (5-, 10-, 15-years-old), eyewitness familiarity with the defendant (personally familiar, casually familiar, stranger), and nature of the crime (personal, non-personal) influenced jurors' judgments. Undergraduate students (N = 568) read a case su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied psychology in criminal justice Vol. 15; no. 2; p. 171
Main Authors Pica, Emily, Pozzulo, Joanna, Sheahan, Chelsea L, Pratt, Keltie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Huntsville Sam Houston State University 01.01.2019
Subjects
Crime
Defendants
Guilt
Identification
Undergraduate students
Witnesses
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The current study examined whether eyewitness age (5-, 10-, 15-years-old), eyewitness familiarity with the defendant (personally familiar, casually familiar, stranger), and nature of the crime (personal, non-personal) influenced jurors' judgments. Undergraduate students (N = 568) read a case summary where the eyewitness reported being victim to an abduction or victim of a bike theft and were asked to render a dichotomous verdict, continuous guilt rating, and answer questions regarding their perceptions of the defendant and the eyewitness' identification. Familiarity and nature of the crime interacted to influence guilt ratings, perceptions of the defendant, and perceptions of the eyewitness' identification. Jurors reported higher guilt ratings, lower perceptions of the defendant, and were more likely to believe the eyewitness' identification was accurate when the eyewitness and defendant were familiar with each other and the crime was personal compared to nonpersonal. These results suggest familiarity between witnesses and defendants can influence jurors' perceptions and how believable the eyewitness identification is perceived to be.
ISSN:1550-3550
1550-4409