PROBABILITY DISCOUNTING OF LEGAL AND NON-LEGAL OUTCOMES

Probability discounting describes how the subjective value of an outcome changes because its delivery is uncertain. Although many legal decisions involve probability discounting, it has not been systematically studied. Participants were recruited to complete a probability-discounting task that asses...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehavior and social issues Vol. 21; p. 165
Main Authors Weatherly, Jeffrey N, Wise, Richard A, Derenne, Adam
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer Nature B.V 01.01.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Probability discounting describes how the subjective value of an outcome changes because its delivery is uncertain. Although many legal decisions involve probability discounting, it has not been systematically studied. Participants were recruited to complete a probability-discounting task that assessed two legal (i.e., murder & embezzlement) and two non-legal (winning a sweepstakes & receiving medical treatment) hypothetical scenarios. They also completed several measures to assess attitudes related to legal issues. Different rates of discounting were observed across the four scenarios. Factor analysis indicated that discounting of the legal scenarios loaded onto a different factor than one of the non-legal scenarios (with the other cross loading on both). Only the participants' estimation of what constituted reasonable doubt was a reliable predictor of their rates of discounting of the legal outcomes. The present results have a number of potential social implications, both for the study of probability discounting and the understanding of legal decision-making. They also highlight the need for more experimental research on overt behavior.
ISSN:1064-9506
2376-6786
DOI:10.5210/bsi.v.2110.4183