"The Architecture of Erasure"-Fantasy or Reality?

Iraeli et al stresses it is Saree Makdisi's thesis that the museum reflects Israel's "uneasy" relationship with the Palestinian community and a desire to keep the Palestinians in its midst out of sight and out of mind, in effect to "erase" their presence and to disregar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCritical inquiry Vol. 36; no. 3; p. 563
Main Authors Israeli, Raphael, Berkovits, Shmuel, Neriah, Jacques, Hier, Marvin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chicago University of Chicago, acting through its Press 01.04.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Iraeli et al stresses it is Saree Makdisi's thesis that the museum reflects Israel's "uneasy" relationship with the Palestinian community and a desire to keep the Palestinians in its midst out of sight and out of mind, in effect to "erase" their presence and to disregard their history. They note that Makdisi's suggestion that Frank Gehry "consciously" sought to evoke the separation barrier in his design of the museum, is chronologically impossible. Gehry was chosen to design the museum in 1999, long before the barrier was conceived or implemented in 2003. Nor did he design the museum knowing that ancient graves were located beneath the site. These graves were not discovered until after construction began in 2005. All that Gehry knew at the time was that he was designing a building on a site that had served as the city's municipal car park for several decades.
ISSN:0093-1896
1539-7858
DOI:10.1086/653413