Hearing handicap and frailty in community-dwelling older adults living
To verify the relationship between hearing handicap and frailty in community-dwelling older adults. A cross-sectional study was carried out with 238 older adults (aged ≥ 60 years) in 2018. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly - Screening version - HHIE-S was applied to assess the hearing h...
Saved in:
Published in | CoDAS (São Paulo) Vol. 34; no. 4; p. e20210080 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Portuguese English |
Published |
Brazil
Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To verify the relationship between hearing handicap and frailty in community-dwelling older adults.
A cross-sectional study was carried out with 238 older adults (aged ≥ 60 years) in 2018. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly - Screening version - HHIE-S was applied to assess the hearing handicap. To assess frailty, the Frailty Phenotype proposed for Fried and co-workers was adopted, objectively evaluating 5 criteria: unintentional weight loss, reported fatigue, reduced grip strength, reduced walking speed and low physical activity. It was investigated whether the hearing handicap were related with frailty using Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman test.
Worse perception of the hearing handicap was found in pre-frail and frail individuals, compared to non-frail individuals. In addition, hearing handicap showed a positive and statistically significant correlation with frailty.
Hearing handicap is related to frailty in community-dwelling older adults. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Author contributions: RDSC participated in the conception and design of the study, data collection, analysis and interpretation, and text editing; MSZ participated in the conception and design of the study and article review; FSO was responsible for the conception and design of the study, data analysis and interpretation, and article review; SCIP, MRC, AASO, GAOG and ACMG participated in the analysis and interpretation of data and article review; ITMJ participated in the conception and design of the study, data collection, analysis and interpretation, and article review; LPCG participated as advisor in the conception of the study, analysis, interpretation of data, and text editing. Conflict of interests: nothing to declare. |
ISSN: | 2317-1782 |
DOI: | 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021080 |