Comparative study of HPV and Cervical Cancer Knowledge and Beliefs between Mexican Immigrant Women in the US and Peruvian Women

Cervical cancer remains one of the major cancers affecting women from developing countries, especially those from socioeconomically disadvantage backgrounds. In the US, Hispanic immigrant women experience restricted access to health care and higher incidence rates of cervical cancer compared to the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer health disparities Vol. 3; pp. e1 - e16
Main Authors Luque, John S, Maupin, Jonathan, Ferris, Daron G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Cervical cancer remains one of the major cancers affecting women from developing countries, especially those from socioeconomically disadvantage backgrounds. In the US, Hispanic immigrant women experience restricted access to health care and higher incidence rates of cervical cancer compared to the non-Hispanic white population. Knowledge of cervical cancer risk factors and symptoms is associated with greater interest in participating in regular cervical cancer screening. To explore knowledge and beliefs about cervical cancer, survey questionnaires were administered to Mexican immigrant women in southeast Georgia, US and to mestizo women - primarily Quechua language dominant speakers - in Cusco, Peru. As part of these survey studies, there was a list of 32 items asking participants to agree or disagree with whether certain symptoms or risk factors could cause cervical cancer and a pile sort of 15 of the most salient items. Cultural consensus analysis was used to calculate overall agreement with a cultural model of cervical cancer risk factor knowledge in each sample independently. For the Georgia sample, there was marginal consensus, but for the Peru sample, there was no consensus. Analysis of cultural competence values and residual agreement show significant differences across education in the Georgia study, with a positive correlation between education and cultural competence (r=0.50, p=0.001), but not in the Peru study. Likewise, the results of the pile sort data exhibited consensus for the Georgia sample for the cervical cancer risk factors, but not for the Peru sample. The lack of consensus among the Peru sample on either task suggests little widespread knowledge on risk factors of cervical cancer. Additional analyses related to factors associated with screening behaviors from the cultural cancer screening scale indicated more pronounced fatalistic beliefs and catastrophic disease expectations about cervical cancer among the Peruvian women compared to the Mexican immigrant women.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Authors’ contributions
Conception and design: JL
Data analysis: JL, JM
Literature review and manuscript writing: JL, JM, DF
ISSN:2573-9530