NMR Structure of μ-Conotoxin GIIIC: Leucine 18 Induces Local Repacking of the N-Terminus Resulting in Reduced Na V Channel Potency

• Published in: Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 23; no. 10
• Main Authors: Harvey, Peta J, Kurniawan, Nyoman D, Finol-Urdaneta, Rocio K, McArthur, Jeffrey R, Van Lysebetten, Dorien, Dash, Thomas S, Hill, Justine M, Adams, David J, Durek, Thomas, Craik, David J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland 22.10.2018
• Subjects: Amino Acid Sequence; Conotoxins - chemical synthesis; Conotoxins - chemistry; Conotoxins - pharmacology; Disulfides - chemistry; Leucine - chemistry; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Models, Molecular; Peptides - chemical synthesis; Peptides - chemistry; Protein Conformation; Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs; Sodium Channel Blockers - chemical synthesis; Sodium Channel Blockers - chemistry; Sodium Channel Blockers - pharmacology; Sodium Channels - chemistry; Sodium Channels - metabolism; Structure-Activity Relationship; protein structure; μ-conotoxins; NMR; voltage-gated sodium channel blocker
• ISSN: 1420-3049
• DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102715

μ-Conotoxins are potent and highly specific peptide blockers of voltage-gated sodium channels. In this study, the solution structure of μ-conotoxin GIIIC was determined using 2D NMR spectroscopy and simulated annealing calculations. Despite high sequence similarity, GIIIC adopts a three-dimensional structure that differs from the previously observed conformation of μ-conotoxins GIIIA and GIIIB due to the presence of a bulky, non-polar leucine residue at position 18. The side chain of L18 is oriented towards the core of the molecule and consequently the N-terminus is re-modeled and located closer to L18. The functional characterization of GIIIC defines it as a canonical μ-conotoxin that displays substantial selectivity towards skeletal muscle sodium channels (Na ), albeit with ~2.5-fold lower potency than GIIIA. GIIIC exhibited a lower potency of inhibition of Na 1.4 channels, but the same Na selectivity profile when compared to GIIIA. These observations suggest that single amino acid differences that significantly affect the structure of the peptide do in fact alter its functional properties. Our work highlights the importance of structural factors, beyond the disulfide pattern and electrostatic interactions, in the understanding of the functional properties of bioactive peptides. The latter thus needs to be considered when designing analogues for further applications.