군사부문 온실가스 배출량 산정에 관한 연구

• Published in: 한국기후변화학회지 Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 177 - 186
• Main Authors: 송기봉(Song, Ki Pong), 최상진(Choi, Sang Jin), 김정(Kim, Jeong), 장영기(Jang, Young Kee)
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Korean
• Published: 한국기후변화학회 01.06.2017
• Subjects: 학제간연구; Diesel Combustion; GHG Emission; Aviation; Military Sector; Emission Category
• ISSN: 2093-5919; 2586-2782
• DOI: 10.15531/ksccr.2017.8.2.177

In this research, we have developed standardized procedures for preparing of emission inventories on military sector. The procedures are as follows; 1) Identify all relevant emission sources list of military sector in Republic of Korea. 2) Select methods to estimate GHGs emissions by source categories such as heating boilers, tactical vehicles, military vessels and military aviation from US EPA, IPCC, EEA/EMEP, and ROK Ministry of Environment. 3) Identify and select data sources for activities and parameters from Korea annual oil statistics and Korea Procurement system. 4) Compare with each GHGs emission used by each activities. The conclusive results utilized by emission source categories and associated factors are described as follows; In 2013, GHGs was estimated 2,656 kilotons CO2-eq emitted by military sector. The diesel combustion contributed from a minimum of 43.8% to a maximum of 50.2% and JP-8 contributed from a minimum of 43.7% to a maximum of 52.8% to the 2001∼2015 GHGs emission trend. In the result of comparing GHGs emissions with Korea Annual Oil Statistics (Tier 1) and supplied fuel through the Korea Procurement System (Tier 2) in 2015, the total GHGs emission was 2,867 kilotons CO2-eq estimated by Tier 2 is similar to the emission estimated by Tier 1. However, this reveals that the GHGs emission separated by local areas were a lot of different from Tier 1 and 2. The cause of difference between Tier 1 and Tier 2 was that Korea annual oil statistics utilized data from a fuel supplier. The data does not reflect the reality of the location of end user. KCI Citation Count: 2