기후변화 대응을 위한 수처리 여과시스템 선정 방안 연구
The problem of water shortages and water related disasters caused by climate change has increased the seriousness of water problems and the importance of water treatment technology capable of securing clean water is expanding. In this study, we analyzed not only the water pollutant generated by the...
Saved in:
Published in | 한국기후변화학회지 Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 75 - 80 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Korean |
Published |
한국기후변화학회
01.03.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2093-5919 2586-2782 |
DOI | 10.15531/ksccr.2018.9.1.75 |
Cover
Summary: | The problem of water shortages and water related disasters caused by climate change has increased the seriousness of water problems and the importance of water treatment technology capable of securing clean water is expanding. In this study, we analyzed not only the water pollutant generated by the filtration system technology of various water treatment technologies but also the indirect greenhouse gas emissions generation, and analyzed the influence on the environment. The subjects of study are Fabric Filter, Reverse Osmosis System and Pressurized Microfiltration Device which are widely used for water treatment and we analyzed the impact on the environment using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method using the electricity amount necessary for use, the water purification efficiency, the throughput per ton and the cost. The amount of greenhouse gas generated when the Pressurized Microfiltration Device operates for 1 year is 2.15E+04 kg CO2-eq., Fabric Filter is 3.29E+04 kg CO2-eq., and Reverse Osmosis System is 1.68E+05 kg CO2-eq. As a result of analyzing the amount of greenhouse gas generated at the time of purifying 1 ton of the Pressurized Microfiltration Device and the conventional filtration system, the Pressurized Microfiltration Device was 20.5 g CO2-eq., Fabric Filter was 34.7 g CO2-eq., and Reverse Osmosis System was 191.7 g CO2-eq. The amount of greenhouse gas generated was calculated to be 41.0% less than that of the Fabric Filter by the Pressurized Microfiltration Device and 89.3% less than the Reverse Osmosis System.
From the viewpoint of climate change, it is necessary to select a filtration system that takes climate change into account, not from the viewpoint of water quality removal efficiency and economic efficiency according to future water treatment applications, and it is necessary to select a water treatment filtration system more researches and improvements will be made for. KCI Citation Count: 2 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2093-5919 2586-2782 |
DOI: | 10.15531/ksccr.2018.9.1.75 |