건물 구조 특성에 따른 기밀성능 및 난방 에너지 요구량 분석

Purpose: The importance of building airtightness is increased as the demand and expectation of building energy efficiency is growing. Previous research only focused on airtightness of building openings only to improve building airtightness. However, the analysis of difference of airtightness perform...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKIEAE Journal Vol. 15; no. 2; pp. 109 - 115
Main Authors 이수인(Lee, Su-In), 김정국(Kim, Jeong-Gook), 김서훈(Kim, Seo-Hun), 김종훈(Kim, Jong-Hun), 정학근(Jeong, Hak-Geun), 장철용(Jang, Cheol-Yong)
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 한국생태환경건축학회 01.04.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2288-968X
2288-9698
DOI10.12813/kieae.2015.15.2.109

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose: The importance of building airtightness is increased as the demand and expectation of building energy efficiency is growing. Previous research only focused on airtightness of building openings only to improve building airtightness. However, the analysis of difference of airtightness performance according to the characteristic of building structure has not been performed. Therefore, this study analyzed the difference of airtightness performance according to building structural characteristics in a number of ways. Method: Airtightness that are classified as rigid-frame type or wall type are measured and analyzed the difference of airtightness performance between rigid frame type apartments and wall type apartments. This study calculated the heating energy demand and quantitatively analysis using ISO 13790. Futhermore, this study compared research trend of domestic airtightness performance with airtightness standards of the developed countries based on the field measurement. Result: Airtight performance of wall type is better than rigid frame type in terms of energy saving. The difference of heating energy demand between wall type and rigid frame type was 8.14kWh/㎡yr. KCI Citation Count: 1
Bibliography:G704-001946.2015.15.2.003
ISSN:2288-968X
2288-9698
DOI:10.12813/kieae.2015.15.2.109