위암 환자에서 RT-PCR법에 의한 복강 내 CEA 측정의 의의

Purpose: Free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity exfoliated from a tumor are considered to be responsible for peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer. To detect free cancer cells, a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was introduced to the marker of gastric cancer. The clinical significance of dete...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of surgical treatment and research Vol. 63; no. 4; pp. 287 - 291
Main Authors 인영준(Young Jun In), 박기호(Ki Ho Park), 박기혁(Ki Hyuk Park), 최동락(Dong Rak Choi), 주대현(Dae Hyun Joo), 이한일(Han Il Lee), 박성환(Sung Hwan Park), 유용운(Yong Woon Yu), 전창호(Chang Ho Jun)
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 대한외과학회 01.10.2002
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose: Free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity exfoliated from a tumor are considered to be responsible for peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer. To detect free cancer cells, a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was introduced to the marker of gastric cancer. The clinical significance of detecting the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) mRNA in the peritoneal fluid was evaluated by RT-PCR in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: In 50 patients with gastric cancer who received a gastrectomy, the peritoneal washing fluids were obtained and the CEA mRNA was detected by RT-PCR and a cytological examination was taken, simultaneously. The results were correlated with the stage and the recurrence of peritoneal seeding. Results: Positive values of CEA mRNA from the peritoneal washing fluids were observed in 24% (12/50) of patients with gastric cancer but of 4% (2/50) showed peritoneal cytology. There were 8 cases of peritoneal seeding in the follow-up and 6 cases of them presented positive CEA mRNA values (50%, 6/12). According to the stage, positive CEA mRNA values from the peritoneal washing fluids were found in 9% (2/21) in stage I, 20% (2/10) in stage II, 33% (5/15) in stage III and 75% (3/4) in stage IV (P=0.030). In the T classification, positive CEA mRNA values were found in 13% (2/15) in T1, 10% (1/10) in T2, 30% (7/23) in T3 and 100% (2/2) in T4 (P=0.031). In the N classification, positive CEA mRNA values were found in 15% (4/26) in N0, 20% (3/15) in N1, 40%(2/5) in N2 and 75% (3/4) in N3 (P=0.055). Conclusion: These results suggest that the detection of CEA mRNA by RT-PCR in peritoneal fluid of gastric cancer patients was more sensitive than the peritoneal cytology, and may have a role in selecting patients with a poor prognosis who may benefit from adjuvant therapy. (J Korean Surg Soc 2002;63:287-291) KCI Citation Count: 0
Bibliography:http://kmbase.medric.or.kr/Main.aspx?d=KMBASE&m=VIEW&i=0371320020630040287
G704-000991.2002.63.4.014
ISSN:2288-6575
2288-6796