Reversal of female sterilisation: outcome of 210 referrals

• Published in: New Zealand medical journal Vol. 106; no. 955; p. 173
• Main Authors: Gillett, W R, Martin, W L, Romans, S E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New Zealand 12.05.1993
• Subjects: Adult; Counseling - economics; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Sterilization Reversal - psychology; Sterilization, Tubal - psychology; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Family Planning Programs; Programs; Regret; Organization And Administration; Referral And Consultation; Psychological Factors; Dropouts; Family Planning; Socioeconomic Factors; Oceania; New Zealand; Economic Factors; Psychosocial Factors; Developed Countries; Female Sterilization; Counseling; Clinic Activities; Population; Reversibility; Sterilization, Sexual; Behavior; Program Activities; Demographic Factors
• ISSN: 0028-8446

To determine the outcome of request for reversal of sterilisation and to compare demographic and social factors of women who subsequently withdrew their request with those who proceeded with the reversal assessment and operation. Information relating to the sterilisation and regret intervals were sought from 210 women. Demographic and social factors were recorded and the outcome of the reversal request determined. Patients who withdrew or were deferred/declined were compared on relevant factors with the group who proceeded to, or are still planning, the reversal operation. Ninety-two (44%) withdrew before or during the assessment phase. Another 13 withdrew after laparoscopy identified a poor prognosis. Three declared their intention not to conceive after they underwent the reversal operation. To date, 83 have had surgery with the cumulative intrauterine pregnancy rate at 1, 2 and 3 years being 0.46, 0.62 and 0.78 respectively. In comparing those women who proceeded and withdrew, there were no differences in mean age at referral, age at sterilisation, the number of living children nor marital status. The regret interval prior to referral was significantly longer in the women who proceeded (27.9 and 19.5 months respectively, p = 0.03). Those who were highly motivated in their reversal request were also more likely to proceed (p = 0.003). There is a large dropout rate of women who seek a reversal of sterilisation. Women who regret sterilisation may have sought sterilisation as a solution to problems that were psychosocial rather than contraceptive in nature. We stress the importance of counselling for both sterilisation and its reversal, since in the latter many developmental personality and relationship problems remain unresolved.