A constructional account of English small and nonfinite clauses
The proper treatment of so-called Small Clauses (SQ including nonfinite clauses has been rather controversial in theories of English grammar. There are arguments for - as well as arguments against - the postulation of SCs, and multiple analytical alternatives thereof. Drawing from Pollard and Sag (1...
Saved in:
Published in | Linguistic research Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 389 - 438 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Seoul
Kyung Hee Institute for the Study of Language and Information
01.12.2020
언어정보연구소 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The proper treatment of so-called Small Clauses (SQ including nonfinite clauses has been rather controversial in theories of English grammar. There are arguments for - as well as arguments against - the postulation of SCs, and multiple analytical alternatives thereof. Drawing from Pollard and Sag (1994) and Culicover and Jackendoff (2005), we argue that only a small set of English verbs allow SC complements, and that there is a large family of constructions where [NP Predicate] sequences form a constituent. We depart from the latter, however, in including in this set of constructions gerundive phrases, absolute constructions, and - most notably - subject-auxiliary inversion constructions and SCs. We formalize a general account of these families of constructions in HPSG (Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 http://isli.khu.ac.kr/journal/content/data/37_3/2.pdf |
ISSN: | 1229-1374 |
DOI: | 10.17250/khisli.37.3.202012.002 |