A constructional account of English small and nonfinite clauses

The proper treatment of so-called Small Clauses (SQ including nonfinite clauses has been rather controversial in theories of English grammar. There are arguments for - as well as arguments against - the postulation of SCs, and multiple analytical alternatives thereof. Drawing from Pollard and Sag (1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLinguistic research Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 389 - 438
Main Authors Kim, Jong-Bok, Chaves, Rui P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Seoul Kyung Hee Institute for the Study of Language and Information 01.12.2020
언어정보연구소
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The proper treatment of so-called Small Clauses (SQ including nonfinite clauses has been rather controversial in theories of English grammar. There are arguments for - as well as arguments against - the postulation of SCs, and multiple analytical alternatives thereof. Drawing from Pollard and Sag (1994) and Culicover and Jackendoff (2005), we argue that only a small set of English verbs allow SC complements, and that there is a large family of constructions where [NP Predicate] sequences form a constituent. We depart from the latter, however, in including in this set of constructions gerundive phrases, absolute constructions, and - most notably - subject-auxiliary inversion constructions and SCs. We formalize a general account of these families of constructions in HPSG (Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
http://isli.khu.ac.kr/journal/content/data/37_3/2.pdf
ISSN:1229-1374
DOI:10.17250/khisli.37.3.202012.002