Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

In a multinational, randomized study, pembrolizumab produced significantly improved progression-free and overall survival and less high-grade toxicity than did ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. Two therapeutic strategies have improved survival for patients with advanced melanoma in re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe New England journal of medicine Vol. 372; no. 26; pp. 2521 - 2532
Main Authors Robert, Caroline, Schachter, Jacob, Long, Georgina V, Arance, Ana, Grob, Jean Jacques, Mortier, Laurent, Daud, Adil, Carlino, Matteo S, McNeil, Catriona, Lotem, Michal, Larkin, James, Lorigan, Paul, Neyns, Bart, Blank, Christian U, Hamid, Omid, Mateus, Christine, Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie, Kosh, Michele, Zhou, Honghong, Ibrahim, Nageatte, Ebbinghaus, Scot, Ribas, Antoni
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Massachusetts Medical Society 25.06.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In a multinational, randomized study, pembrolizumab produced significantly improved progression-free and overall survival and less high-grade toxicity than did ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. Two therapeutic strategies have improved survival for patients with advanced melanoma in recent years: immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies blocking BRAF and MEK. 1 BRAF and MEK inhibitors are indicated for the approximately 40 to 50% of patients with BRAF V600 mutations, 1 whereas immunotherapies are effective independently of BRAF mutational status. 2 Ipilimumab, which blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), a coinhibitory molecule of the immune system, 3 , 4 is approved for treating advanced melanoma on the basis of its survival benefit. 5 , 6 However, grade 3 or 4 adverse events, mostly immune-related, 7 are observed in 23% of patients. 5 , 6 When activated . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1503093