Sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest in patients with subacute cerebral infarction

[Abstract.] [Purpose] To compare the sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in patients with subacute cerebral infarction. [Participants and Methods] Thirty patients with subacut...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Physical Therapy Science Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 69 - 74
Main Authors SATOSHI HASEGAWA, TOMOKO MATSUI, MAYUMI KISHI, HIROKUNI KOUCHI, MASAKI WATANABE, TADASHI YANAGISAWA, SHIGERU USUDA
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2021
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Abstract.] [Purpose] To compare the sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in patients with subacute cerebral infarction. [Participants and Methods] Thirty patients with subacute cerebral infarction participated in this study. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Berg Balance Scale, and ambulatory ability were assessed on admission and discharge. Sensitivity to change was calculated using the effect size, standardized response mean, and relative efficiency. Responsiveness was analyzed by comparing the ability of the difference between the scores of the balance assessments at admission and discharge in classifying the participants' ambulatory independence. [Results] All assessments showed significant improvement from admission to discharge. The effect size of the three versions of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test ranged from 0.41 to 0.69. The standardized response mean ranged from 0.75 to 1.28. The cutoff score was 16.7% for the Balance Evaluation Systems Test, 5.5 points for the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, 1.5 points for the Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and 3.5 points for the Berg Balance Scale. [Conclusion] The sensitivity to change of the three versions of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test was high or moderate. However, the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test had the highest responsiveness, as determined with the extent of ambulatory independence.
ISSN:0915-5287