형광유리 선량계와 광자극 발광선량계를 이용한 핵의학과 선량 측정비교

This study was conducted from July 1 to September 30, 2018 using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter(OSLD) and photoluminescent glass dosimeter(PLD) to measure the 3-month exposure dose and the cumulative dose in the active working area of the nuclear medicine worker Respectively. As a resul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in방사선기술과학 Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 47 - 51
Main Authors 박정규(Park Jeong kyu), 손상준(Son Sang Joon), 박명환(Park Myeong Hwan)
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 대한방사선과학회(구 대한방사선기술학회) 28.02.2019
KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY
대한방사선과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study was conducted from July 1 to September 30, 2018 using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter(OSLD) and photoluminescent glass dosimeter(PLD) to measure the 3-month exposure dose and the cumulative dose in the active working area of the nuclear medicine worker Respectively. As a result, the cumulative dose for three months in the worker and work area was measured as 1.97 mSv and 2.02 mSv in the PLD. The mean surface dose and the mean depth dose of the OSLD were measured to be 2.04 mSv. The difference in the total surface dose measured by the PLD and the OSLD was 0.66mSv and the total mean surface dose was 0.07mSv. The difference between the total depth dose and the total depth dose was 0.1mSv and 0.02mSv, respectively. It was found that the dose value of the OSLD was higher than that of the PLD. In addition, it was found that the maximum difference of 0.01mSv was observed between the PLD and the OSLD of the worker. For the dose measurement of the two dosimetry systems, there was no significant difference between the PLD and the OSLD in the surface dose of 0.239 (p>0.05). Also, the significance of PLD and OSLD in the deep dose was 0.109, which was not statistically significant (p>0.05).
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201912742273292
http://journal.iksrs.or.kr
ISSN:2288-3509
2384-1168
DOI:10.17946/JRST.2019.42.1.47