해석모델링 방법에 따른 선체거더의 수중폭발 휘핑응답 비교
One and three dimensional whipping response analyses of a naval surface combatant subjected to an underwater explosion bubble pulse were carried out to compare the efficiency and accuracy according to the modeling methods. In 1-D analysis, program UNDEXWHIP developed by KIMM was used, which is based...
Saved in:
Published in | 大韓造船學會 論文集 Vol. 42; no. 6; pp. 631 - 636 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Korean |
Published |
대한조선학회
2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1225-1143 2287-7355 |
Cover
Summary: | One and three dimensional whipping response analyses of a naval surface combatant subjected to an underwater explosion bubble pulse were carried out to compare the efficiency and accuracy according to the modeling methods. In 1-D analysis, program UNDEXWHIP developed by KIMM was used, which is based on the thin-walled Timoshenko's beam theory and on the modal analysis method using wetted vibratory modes of the hull girder. In 3-D analysis, three finite element models were suggested using LS-DYNA/USA code, such as 3-D beam model considering geometric shape of wetted side shell, coarse and fine 3-D F.E. models. Through the comparison of results from the 1-D and 3-D analyses, it could be confirmed that 1-D analysis result is in good agreement with 3-D analysis ones, and that fine 3-D F.E. model, shock analysis one, is also used both in the shock response and whipping response analyses for the analyst effort and time savings. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200509409857343 G704-000005.2005.42.6.013 |
ISSN: | 1225-1143 2287-7355 |