사상체질 진단 연구의 전문가 일치도와 진단 정확률

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current inter-expert agreement of Sasang Constitution Medicine (SCM), to expand the current knowledge on the causes of imperfect inter-expert agreement, and to explore possible solutions for improving inter-expert agreement. A literature search was conduc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in동의생리병리학회지 Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 185 - 196
Main Authors 한은경(Eunkyung Han), 권영규(Young Kyu Kwon)
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 한의병리학회 2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1738-7698
2288-2529
2283-2529
DOI10.15188/kjopp.2018.08.32.4.185

Cover

More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current inter-expert agreement of Sasang Constitution Medicine (SCM), to expand the current knowledge on the causes of imperfect inter-expert agreement, and to explore possible solutions for improving inter-expert agreement. A literature search was conducted to gather data on the studies on diagnosis of SCM. The 127 articles included in this analysis had a mean 4.1 publications per year, 56.0% published in the Journal of Sasang Constitutional Medicine between the year of 1987 and 2017. SCM specialist participated in 96.3% of all the expert judgment cases. Inter-expert agreement was reported in 14.8% of the cases that had two or more experts. We recommend that expert panels integrate the results of current status of diagnostic consensus into guideline development and strengthen expert education and training with the aim of improving SCM diagnostic accuracy.
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201828566323906
https://kmpath.jams.or.kr/co/main/jmMain.kci
ISSN:1738-7698
2288-2529
2283-2529
DOI:10.15188/kjopp.2018.08.32.4.185