한의학 교육에서 진료수행평가에 대한 학생 만족도 및 환자-의사관계 점수의 채점자간 비교 연구

As for medical education, not only acquirement of knowledge but also practical clinical competence is important because it is needed on primary medicine. Under this trend, Clinical Performance Examination(CPX) is already being practiced in medical college. But in spite of its importance, CPX is not...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in동의생리병리학회지 Vol. 29; no. 2; pp. 152 - 159
Main Author 조충식(Chung Sik Cho)
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 한의병리학회 2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1738-7698
2288-2529
2283-2529
DOI10.15188/kjopp.2015.04.29.2.152

Cover

More Information
Summary:As for medical education, not only acquirement of knowledge but also practical clinical competence is important because it is needed on primary medicine. Under this trend, Clinical Performance Examination(CPX) is already being practiced in medical college. But in spite of its importance, CPX is not yet practiced in Korean medical college. So, by contemplating necessity and outcome of CPX, We try to offer basic data for future imposition and improvement of CPX in Korean medical education. 49 students of grade 3 in a Daejeon Korean Medical College were targets of investigation. After educated about CPX in advance, They treated simulated patient and answered questionnaire about CPX. Then, their treatment was scored by Professor and simulated patients. Total 49 members responded to the survey and the results of the analysis were as follows. The answer that CPX is useful(Mean=4.12) and essential for acquiring professionalism of treatment(Mean=4.02) was got high scores. But many respondents replied about necessity of better CPX environment and felt difficulty about PPI(45%). Meanwhile, Professor group(Mean=9.24) tended to give more high score than Simulated patient group(Mean=7.94). This study can be very useful for composing basic data of CPX in Korean medical College and improving practical clinical competence of students. But this study has also some limits like area, respondent selection, group module etc. So, more detailed and comprehensive survey is needed. This work was supported by the Daejeon University Research Grant.
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201525966593250
http://society.kisti.re.kr/sv/SV_svjscj03L.do?method=list&poid=ksomp&kojic=DRSRDH&sVnc=v28n5&menuid=1&subid=13
G704-000534.2015.29.2.010
ISSN:1738-7698
2288-2529
2283-2529
DOI:10.15188/kjopp.2015.04.29.2.152