한의학적 운동치료로서 기공과 도인의 효과에 따른 차이 고찰

• Published in: 동의생리병리학회지 Vol. 27; no. 5; pp. 594 - 601
• Main Authors: 황의형(Eui Hyoung Hwang), 권영규(Young Kyu Kwon), 허광호(Kwang Ho Heo), 조현우(Hyun Woo Cho), 이현엽(Hyeon Yeop Lee), 성우용(Woo Yong Sung)
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Korean
• Published: 한의병리학회 2013
• Subjects: 한의학; Daoyin(導引); Qigong; Wuqinxi(五禽戱); Baduanjin(八段錦); Daoyin; Baduanjin; Wuqinxi
• ISSN: 1738-7698; 2288-2529; 2283-2529
• DOI: 10.15188/kjopp.2013.10.27.5.594

The aim of this study was to analyze the differences between Qigong and Daoyin as a therapeutic exercise of traditional Korean medicine. We searched Pubmed and Chinese Academic Journals(CAJ) over time periods from their inception to August 13th, 2013. We analyzed the systematic reviews of Qigong and clinical trials of Daoyin. Total 12 Qigong and 16 Daoyin(11 Baduanjin, 4 Wuqinxi, 1 unspecified type of Daoyin) articles were met our inclusion criteria. As the results of our analyzation, Qigong was dominant in chronic or incurable disease. On the other hand, Daoyin was dominant in internal diseases or functional improving of internal organs. As using "Qi" is in common between Qigong and Daoyin, they have not been differentiated in world of traditional Korean medicine. However, it could be better to use the Qigong and Daoyin according to their effectual difference.