양생기공과 심리기술훈련의 구성요인과 측정평가방법의 비교 연구

If we can evaluate the training results more appropriately and analyze the psychological changes in more objectively, the training can be more efficient and it can help to solve the problems during the training. This research analyzed the similarity and differences of Yangseng Qigong and psychologic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in동의생리병리학회지 Vol. 22; no. 5; pp. 1047 - 1056
Main Authors 정미영(Mi Young Jung), 한창현(Chang Hyun Han), 박수진(Soo Jin Park), 이상남(Sang Nam Lee), 권영규(Young Kyu Kwon)
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 한의병리학회 2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:If we can evaluate the training results more appropriately and analyze the psychological changes in more objectively, the training can be more efficient and it can help to solve the problems during the training. This research analyzed the similarity and differences of Yangseng Qigong and psychological skill training's components and measurement methods. Also, the research further studied psychological skill training's measurement method. Results : The measurement type of Yangseng Qigong are Sagong, a record of Sagong, Damgong, IIgi, and Sogyeol. Similarly, the measurement type of psychological skills training are questionnaire, interview, personal profile, and observation of a single subject. Despite the similarities between the measurement type of Yangsaeng Qigong and psychological skills training, unfortunately there are differences in the contents. Thus, If we introduce strengths of each method to the other, we may have better measurement methods. The questionnaire method of psychological skills training is the most commonly used method, because it gives concrete, objective, reliable and highly reproducible results. If we refer to the questionnaire development process in psychological skills training, we can have objective and concrete measurement tool for Yangsaeng Qigong training. In the psychological skills training measurement tool development process, there are 5 stages; test conception, test preparation, test execution, question analysis, and test modification. Furthermore, the requirements for the good survey are reliability, validity, practicality, and cultural appropriateness. Through this study, we reached the conclusion that we need to combine two methods together to develop a better method because Yangsaeng Qigong places importance on comprehensive method and realization while psychological skills training places importance on analytical method and objective evaluation. And It seems that a practical study is needed to resolve the concerete problems of Yansaeng Qigong through these concrete cases.
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200835741865697
G704-000534.2008.22.5.027
ISSN:1738-7698
2288-2529
2283-2529