베이지안 네트워크를 이용한 아차사고 평가 모델 개발 및 주요 원인 도출
The relationship between near misses and major accidents can be confirmed using the ratios proposed by Heinrich and Bird. Systematic reviews of previous national and international studies did not reveal the assessment process used in near-miss management systems. In this study, a model was developed...
Saved in:
Published in | 한국안전학회지 Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 54 - 59 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Korean |
Published |
한국안전학회
31.08.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1738-3803 2383-9953 |
Cover
Summary: | The relationship between near misses and major accidents can be confirmed using the ratios proposed by Heinrich and Bird. Systematic reviews of previous national and international studies did not reveal the assessment process used in near-miss management systems. In this study, a model was developed for assessing near misses and major factors were derived through case application. By reviewing national and international literature, 14 factors were selected for each dimension of the P2T (people, procedure, technology) model. To identify the causal relationship between accidents and these factors, a near-miss assessment model was developed using a Bayesian network. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to derive the major factors. To verify the validity of the model, near-miss data obtained from the ethylene production process were applied. As a result, “PE2 (education),” “PR1 (procedure),” and “TE1 (equipment and facility not installed)” were derived as the major factors causing near misses in this process. If actual workplace data are applied to the near-miss assessment model developed in this study, results that are unique to the workplace can be confirmed. In addition, scientific safety management is possible only when priority is given through sensitivity analysis. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Korean Society of Safety KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO202329058017514 |
ISSN: | 1738-3803 2383-9953 |