해외 유사 제도 비교분석을 통한 설계안전성검토 개선 방안

• Published in: 한국안전학회지 Vol. 34; no. 6; pp. 38 - 49
• Main Authors: 김시은, Sieun Kim, 정재민, Jaemin Jeong, 정재욱, Jaewook Jeong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Korean
• Published: 한국안전학회 31.12.2019
• Subjects: CDM; construction safety; design for safety; DFS; PtD; 안전공학; DFS; design for safety; PtD; CDM; construction safety
• ISSN: 1738-3803; 2383-9953
• DOI: 10.14346/JKOSOS.2019.34.6.38

While the overall industrial accident rate has been decreased, but those of the construction industry has not been. For safety management during the planning/design phase, which accounts for 45% of the cause of accident at the construction site, Design For Safety (DFS) was established to minimize a hazard and risk in 2016. Currently, DFS system has difficulty settling down in Korea due to the several reasons. So, this paper aims to propose to the Key Success Factor (KSF) and related action plan to improve DFS system. This study was conducted by following 2 steps: i) identification of problems on current DFS, and ii) proposal of KSF and following action plan for DFS. The DFS in Korea was compared with UK, Singapore, Australia, and US on 7 criteria (application target, execution period, change of design, collaboration among participants, expert participants, alternative review and decision support system). DFS was compared with other countries’s system based on the identical criteria and the corresponding improvement measures were also proposed. The results of this study can be utilized to improve DFS system in various aspects.