Morphine 과 Morphine - Ketorolac Tromethamine 의 지속적 정주에 의한 술후 통증치료 효과 비교

• Published in: The Korean journal of pain Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 37 - 42
• Main Authors: 이광수, Kwang Soo Lee, 이강창, Kang Chang Lee, 송윤
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Korean
• Published: 대한통증학회 1995
• Subjects: Morphine; Postoperative pain; Ketorolac
• ISSN: 2005-9159; 1226-2579; 2093-0569

The intermittent injection of analgesics is a inadquate method for postoperative pain control. Recently a non-electronic, disposable and portable infusor(Boxter Two Day Infusor') has been developed which can deliver analgesics with 2 ml/h speed continuousely. The present study examined the effects of three methods of pain management on recovery in 306 patients undergoing elective surgery in Wonkwang University Hospital. Group 1(n=106) received i.m. Valentac' on a PRN basis. Group 2(n= 100), initial 2 mg of bolus morphine was fol- lowed by 48 mg of continuous infusion. Group 3(n=100), initial 2 mg of morphine followed by morphine 18 mg-ketorolac 120 mg. We evaluated an analgesic efficacy with NRS(numerical rating scale) at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 hours after the operation. The side effects(nausea, vomiting, pruritus, sedation and respiratory depression) were evaluated. In group 1, we asked major concern before operation and efficacy of pain control with pain severity(no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain). The results were as follows: 1) Major concern before operation is pain(40%). 2) 53% of patients suffered pain in group l. 3) Morphine and morphine-ketorolac infusion groups were superior to the i.m.(Valentac®) group with respect to postoperative analgesia. 4) In group 3(morphine-ketorolac), there was no pruritus and mild nausea and vomiting.