최소침습적 금속판 내고정술을 이용한 전위된 관절 내 종골 골절의 임상적 치료결과

Purpose: This study evaluated the clinical results of surgical treatment with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for treating displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus in comparison with conventional lateral extensile approach plate osteosynthesis. Materials and Methods: Of 79 cases...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in대한족부족관절학회지 Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 87 - 93
Main Authors 서재완, 양종헌, 박현우, Suh, Jae Wan, Yang, Jong Heon, Park, Hyun-Woo
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 대한족부족관절학회 01.06.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1738-3757
2288-8551
DOI10.14193/jkfas.2020.24.2.87

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose: This study evaluated the clinical results of surgical treatment with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for treating displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus in comparison with conventional lateral extensile approach plate osteosynthesis. Materials and Methods: Of 79 cases of Sanders type II or III calcaneus fractures, 15 cases treated with the minimally invasive calcaneal plate (group M) and 64 cases treated with lateral extensile approach calcaneal plate (group E) were identified. After successful propensity score matching considering age, sex, diabetes mellitus history, and Sanders type (1:3 ratio), 15 cases (group M) and 45 cases (group E) were matched and the demographic, radiologic, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: The median time of surgery from injury was 2.0 days in group M and 6.0 days in group E (p=0.014). At the six months follow-up, group M showed results comparable with those of group E in radiographic outcomes. In the clinical outcomes, group M showed better postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores than did group E (p=0.001, p=0.008). A greater range of subtalar motion was achieved at the six months follow-up in group M (inversion 20.0° vs. 10.0°, p=0.002; eversion 10.0° vs. 5.0°, p=0.025). Although there were no significant differences in complications between the two groups (1 [6.7%] vs. 7 [15.6%], group M vs. group E; p=0.661), there was only one sural nerve injury and no wound dehiscence and deep infection in group M. Conclusion: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis showed superior clinical outcomes compared with that of the conventional lateral extensile approach plate osteosynthesis in Sanders type II or III calcaneus fractures. We suggest applying minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in Sanders type II or III calcaneus fractures.
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO202019762877281
https://doi.org/10.14193/jkfas.2020.24.2.87
ISSN:1738-3757
2288-8551
DOI:10.14193/jkfas.2020.24.2.87