한국어 개정판 친밀관계경험 척도의 단축형 개발

Objective : The experiences in close relationships questionnaire-revised (ECR-R) (Fraley, Waller & Brennan, 2000) is a valuable tool for measuring adult attachment, and its Korean version, the ECRR-K (Kim, 2004), is widely used in Korea. However, given its substantial length, this study was aime...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnxiety and mood Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 115 - 122
Main Authors 윤혜림, 이원기, 배금예, 이상원, 우정민, 원승희, Yun, Hyerim, Lee, Won-Kee, Bae, Geumye, Lee, Sang-Won, Woo, Jungmin, Won, Seunghee
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 대한불안의학회 01.10.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2586-0151
2586-0046
DOI10.24986/anxmod.2017.13.2.009

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective : The experiences in close relationships questionnaire-revised (ECR-R) (Fraley, Waller & Brennan, 2000) is a valuable tool for measuring adult attachment, and its Korean version, the ECRR-K (Kim, 2004), is widely used in Korea. However, given its substantial length, this study was aimed to develop and validate a short version of the ECRR-K called the ECRR-K14. Methods : Two hundred and ninety-four medical students participated in this study in 2016. They completed the ECRR-K, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), and the UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS). The study authors applied the Rasch rating scale to check each item's model fit and then performed confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) to test the new scale's validity. Results : The authors selected seven items each for the anxiety and avoidance subscales, and the ECRR-K14 showed fair to good internal consistency (Cronbach's ${\alpha}=0.93$ and 0.92 for anxiety and avoidance, respectively). The anxiety subscale showed concurrent validity with the PSS and the RSES while the avoidance subscale showed concurrent validity with the UCLA-LS. The CFAs also demonstrated the validity of the model with a goodness-of-fit index of 0.916. Conclusion : The ECRR-K14 showed excellent reliability and validity and appears to be a promising instrument for measuring the two attachment dimensions in adults.
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201734158359304
http://journal.anxiety.or.kr
ISSN:2586-0151
2586-0046
DOI:10.24986/anxmod.2017.13.2.009